Tuesday, September 25, 2007

the western film

Review

So, let's review our discussion of genre and film noir. We learned that genre's often develop in certain stages: primitive, classical, revisionist, and parodic.

Film noir drew from pulp fiction, gangster films, and German Expressionism in the establishment of its conventions. The films often included archetypal characters like the persistent male hero and the dangerous spider-woman. The stories were set in big cities and often represented violent crimes (in an amoral way). The use of highly-stylized design and archetypal characters (like in Expressionism) was used to illustrate the anxieties felt by American society. The horrors of war, poverty and industrialization seemed to introduce an existential crisis that was addressed in film noir.

Primitive Manifestations of the Western

So, a good while before the invention of film technology, the western genre was created. Literature like James Fenimore Cooper's "Leatherstocking Tales" and the more cheaply-produced dime novels were popular in the early 19th century. Westward expansion was a reality: pioneers were trekking across the country, conflicts among American settlers and Native American communities were occurring, and new territories were being claimed by the United States. These events made their way onto the pages of novels for the entertainment of readers who fascinated with the frontier adventure (but not typically experiencing it as reality).

When film technology was developed in the late 19th century, the subjects of the western were among the first to be documented on the motion picture. Thomas Edison's "Buffalo Dance" is a good example of an early 'spectacle' film (remember the cats boxing) that uses a Native American custom (a familiar subject in westerns) to entertain its audience. Sound has been added to this clip, but the original would have been silent.

Among the first narrative films (films that told a story--as opposed to the 'actuality' films that simply documented day-to-day events), there were the origins of the the western film. Watch how Edison's "Cripple Creek Barroom" seems to foreshadow some common conventions in the classical western.

Edwin S. Porter's The Great Train Robbery expanded upon these early narrative shorts, by including multiple scenes and using new editing techniques like cross-cutting (to demonstrate the simultaneous occurrence of multiple events or to encourage association between two shots). Again, many of the conventions of the western can be identified in the film in their early forms.


The Classical Western Film

While the classical western's official beginning is ambiguous (some argue for Porter and others will delay the beginning until D.W. Griffith's films or even until the development of sound technology) I would say that director John Ford established the western as a film genre. His earliest films, during the silent period, are stories set in the west. He is responsible for the stardom of Western icons John Wayne and Henry Fonda. And during his career, he directed such hugely successful westerns like Stagecoach (1939), My Darling Clementine (1946), She Wore a Yellow Ribbon (1949), Rio Grande (1950), The Searchers (1956), and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962). While John Ford is the only film director who was influential in shaping the western (directors like Howard Hawks, William Wyler, George Stevens, Fred Zinneman, and others made valuable contributions as well), his overwhelming presence in the genre cannot be denied.

The classical western film was set on the frontier. In the assigned chapter for this week, Belton discusses how the situation of the western on this border (much like the film noir's border setting) encourages narrative and thematic emphases on binary opposition. So, at the heart of the relationship between characters in the films is a conflict between the east and west, civilization and wilderness, fact and fiction, culture and nature, community and individual, man and woman. The frontier was the point of intersection between these polar opposites, and it was the place in which the east, the civilized, the cultured, the communal, the masculine must overcome that opposition. So, while the western film showed the inherent conflict in westward expansion, it emphasizes the overcoming of this conflict and champions the idea of manifest destiny.

This formula of binary opposition is seen in the genre's archetypal characters. The division between masculinity and femininity is super-emphasized in these films. I think the characters (or character, you could argue) John Wayne is the personification of the western's idea of masculinity: He's a cowboy. He is not very intelligent. He solves problem through physical conflict. When he is not enforcing the law, he is reaffirming the values of the old west. The western man shares some characteristics with the detective from film noir, but rather than disenchanted with the American institution, the western hero is a representative of it. When John Wayne isn't wearing a star, or a uniform, he wears the iconic cowboy costume, establishing himself as the personification of American ideals (patriotism, justice, imperialism, etc).

The women in the western are much like the women in film noir--they are divided into dual natures. Some of the female characters represent the dominated, colonized, civilized. They are much like film noir's "nurturing women", who are housewives and schoolteachers. They represent the success of America's civilization of the west. Other female characters, often represented as Native American or Mexican, often represent the challenge of American civilization. The characters are more powerful, sexualized, and exoticized, and they (like the land they inhabit and the communities they come from), must be properly civilized.

You can see how the idea of the "taming of the west" is inherently connected with very particular definitions of proper masculinity and femininity and with the domination of men over women. It's no surprise then that the male characters are the protagonists in westerns, while the women either give support or pose a potential threat to the men.

In his book Sixguns and Society, theorist Will Wright breaks down the classic western film into sixteen 'narrative functions':
  1. The hero enters a social group.
  2. The hero is unknown to the social group.
  3. The hero is revealed to have an exceptional ability.
  4. The society recognizes a difference between themselves and the hero; the hero is given a special status.
  5. The society does not completely accept the hero.
  6. There is a conflict of interests between the villains and the society.
  7. the villains are stronger than the society; the society is weak.
  8. There is a strong friendship or respect between the hero and a villain.
  9. The villains threaten the society.
  10. The hero avoids involvement in the conflict.
  11. The villains endanger a friend of the hero.
  12. The hero fights the villains.
  13. The society is safe.
  14. The society accepts the hero.
  15. The hero loses or gives up his special status.
While not each function is present in every western, Wright was able to come to this conclusion by examining common structures of western films. As you can see, the typical narrative has very much to do with the oppositions of the individual and the community, the hero and the villain, and the physical conflict necessary to resolve these conflicts.

Questioning the Classical Western

Now, starting in around the 60's, the conventions of the western have been reevaluated. In 'spaghetti westerns', a revisionist revival of the genre in Italian cinema, the old west is perceived from an international perspective. And while the films maintain many of the genre's conventions, some really substantial questions are raised about some of the principles on which the genre is founded.

Here's the opening scene from the (freaking awesome) Sergio Leone film Once Upon a Time in the West (1968). Check it out and see if you can identify any deviations from classical western convention.

Two of the men killed are played by western icons Woody Strode and Jack Elam. The classical characters are replaced by the new western hero. The new hero arrives by train, and the film's narrative emphasizes the violence and oppression that accompanied the building of the railroad. And finally, the main character, rather than be accompanied by a non-diagetic film score, plays his own theme music on his harmonica--a self-reflexive reference to both the awesomeness that is Ennio Morricone (the film's composer) and the prominence of musical accompaniment in the western film.

Other revisionist westerns like The Wild Bunch, Last of the Mohicans, Unforgiven, Dances with Wolves, Open Range, and Brokeback Mountain further question the ideological assumptions behind the classical genre. Cultural representations (of Mexicans and Native Americans, for example) are examined. Issues of violent oppression are addressed. And the definition of masculinity is reconsidered (especially in Brokeback Mountain).

The Final Frontier

And while people have repeatedly said for the last thirty years that the western film is dead, its elements have been appropriated by other genres. Many of the conventions of genre live on in historical epic films and war films (which we'll discuss next week). And perhaps more significantly, the western genre seems to have birthed the science-fiction film.

The western film's decline in popularity and the sci-fi film's growth popularity in the mid-20th century may have been due to the fact that west was already won. Then, with the Space Race, the next frontier was outer space, so the same conventions and values were transferred to a new narrative location. So, we have macho space-cowboys who combat alien races for control of land and power. (Consider Back to the Future III, Cowboy Bebop, Firefly, Toy Story, etc).

Consider this clip of our friend Han Solo, and see if you can see how the sci-film has adopted conventions of the western.

I think that it's interesting that in some recent sci-fi films, Earth has been the location of alien colonization. This premise situates the human population (often centering on the American people) as the colonized people (Mexican and Native Americans) of the classical western. Except in these films, the natives kick the settlers' butts.


And finally, some films parody the conventions of the western and sci-fi genres, further exposing some of the ideological contradictions found in the classic films. Here's a favorite of mine.

Mel Brooks' film Blazing Saddles addresses the racial stereotypes common to the western genre. And its great.

So What?

So, if the western is supposedly dead, why is this discussion important? Well, I think that our nation's identity is deeply rooted in the depictions of the west and the idealogical perspectives common to these depictions. Issues of gender and race, colonization and oppression are issues addressed in these films and issues that need to be addressed in our society today.

Assignment

Based on on our discussion of binary oppositions (like East/West, civilization/wilderness, etc) and your assigned readings, identify a text (novel, tv show, film, comic book, etc) that uses binary opposition to address an issue related to our studies. (Your text does not have to be a western, but it has to use binary opposition to an issue of race, class, gender, sexuality, etc). Discuss how the use of binary opposition may limit adequate understanding of the issue addressed. Be specific, using examples of plot, characters, and themes from the text (and what they indicate about the issue).

This is a heavier assignment, but you all have done well so far. Be particular about your choice of text. Think hard before you write. And be clear and specific in your writing. You'll do great.

Quiz

From Cooper Thompson's article, define homophobia and misogyny and discuss their relationship to traditional masculinity.

17 comments:

dustin said...

I am going to use the film "Tombstone " to show how binary opposition is used in a western film that way made in the 90's rather than the 30's-60's. This film does not use the traditional cowboys v. Indians, but uses the law v. roughneck cowboys bringing the problem of freedom vs restriction. When Wyatt Earp, Doc Holiday and his 2 other brothers went arrived in Tombstone there was no law and they weren't intending on bringing any either. The people wanted Wyatt to be the marshall because of the reputation that preceded him. After the roughnecks start getting a little crazy at all the bars Earp decides to take the marshall position. In the end one of his brothers and Doc Holiday dies, but he does kill all the cowboys. Wyatt Earp is that masculine man that ends up breaking up with his girlfriend to pursue the pretty actress that is in town. Hes that masculine man that kills the opposition and doesn't care at all about doing. Hes that masculine man that brings order to a desert town that had not known any before. The reason that binary opposition limits the understanding of this story is because sometimes Hollywood lights, glitz, and glamour take away from what really happened. Wyatt Earp might not have been as tough as he seemed. The ladies might not have fell to their knees at his touch. The roughnecks might not have been wrong in what they were doing in Tombstone.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Zach Scray

I am going to use the film “Walking Tall”. It shows binary opposition used in an action film made in 2004. The main character Chris Vaughn (The Rock) returns home from the Army after many years of service, only to realize that the town he grew up in is completely different. It creates the problem of safety vs. corruption. One of Chris Vaughn’s old close school buddies Jay Hamilton owns the majority of the town because the old paper mills failed. He controls the town through his casino (gambling), prostitution, and drugs. After himself being attacked in the casino and his nephew overdosing on drugs Vaughn decides to do something about it. So Vaughn teams up with his best friend Ray (Johnny Knoxville) and becomes the town’s Sheriff. After going right into the Casinos and taking just about everyone out himself he sets things right in the city again. Chris Vaughn definitely fills the “masculine man” role. He hurts people with his hands, guns, and presence. He gets the town girl and the respect from his hometown that he had always wanted. Most importantly he brought down the evil and corruption in the city making it clean once again. Binary opposition limits some of the understanding of the story. The town needed a different source of revenue because the old paper mills were out of date and useless. The casino was providing that income that they needed. Even though some of the stuff that the casino was practicing such as selling drugs and prostitution was wrong, it was revolutionizing the old run down town.

Toney Douglas said...

Check out Wild Wild West

The summary of the movie Wild Wild West is talking Jim West and Artemus Gordon are hired to find General Bloodbath McGrath and stop what he's up to. They discover Dr. Loveless is the real enemy and he captured the world's best scientists and made them build a giant spider.
Loveless was once an honored military leader and inventor until one of his schemes went awry and left him paralyzed from the waist down. Driven mad by the experience, Loveless is determined to get revenge on the United States by assassinating the President, using a 60-foot tall mechanical spider. Assisting Loveless is a team of beautiful female criminals; they also find themselves helped by an attractive woman, Rita Escobar
In the movie Wild Wild West there is much binary opposition. The idea of good verses evil is a major binary opposite in the movie. For example Loveless symbolize evil, the civil war as just ended but loveless is trying to start another war. Loveless want things to go back the way there were. He wants colonies to go back to there original owners, he wants to own most of the United States. In order to do this he kidnapped many scientists and he tried to get the president of the United States to surrender. Jim west and Artemus Gordon would be considered the typical male hero in the Western film. They tried to stop loveless plan and eventually ended succeeding.

Ben Mekler said...

I will use the example of the novel Don Quixote. The novel uses the binary opposition in the case of fantasy vs. reality. Don Quixote is an old man in the 16th century who decides to commit himself to madness and convince himself he is a valiant knight errant in an age where knights are long gone. Quixote goes on many misadventures, leading around a poor, uneducated man named Sancho Panza to whom he has convinced will be rewarded with a small island once he has pleased his imagined princess Dulcinea. Quixote stumbles through hallucinations that always end in injuries sustained by either himself or others. The most famous of his exploits involves his mistaking of a windmill for a giant, swinging his arms. Quixote charges the windmill, piercing it with his lance, and drags himself and his horse into the air, than back to the ground with great force. Eventually, Quixote is awakened to his madness by his greedy niece and her doctor fiance. He dies shortly thereafter, but not without having changed the lives of many, and made the world around him just a little more optimistic. Quixote is the epitome of the classic masculine hero, following the lead of his chivalric heroes from the romantic novels he obsessed over before his life as a knight errant. He battles evil wherever he believes to see it, by sword, lance, or fist, and recovers quickly from his many injuries despite his fragility and age. He treats women as idols to be fought for, and always in the name of justice. Quixote uses his vision of a world of fantasy, filled with dragons, damsels, and enchanters, to battle the harsh realities of a pessimistic colonial Spain. He stops bandits and violent madmen, but he also injures the innocent, including a group of monks carrying a corpse. Quixote mistakes them for body snatchers and attempts to fight the monks, but they beat him to the ground. Although the innocent are attacked in Quixote's dreamy madness, they all seem affected spiritually by the unrelenting hope and optimism Quixote carries with him. Without Quixote's sallying forth into the world, it may have been safer from his occasional violent outburst, however, Sancho Panza would not have learned to be a hero in the end, and in the musical version of the tale, the "kitchen whore" Aldonza would not have learned to see herself as a princess, Dulcinea. Don Quixote teaches through his chivalric masculinity that the world can be what you wish it, and thus defeats a grim vision of reality.

Unknown said...

The Stepford Wives
In the film, The Stepford Wives, the issue of gender is addressed using binary opposition. There is a very noticeable gender division in this film because it shows the idealistic man’s role and woman’s role. Man typically are the head of the household and they are the person of power and superiority in their family. The woman has her role of playing mother to the children, taking care of her husband, and doing all of the chores around the house. This film has a significant point at the end when the main character Joanna shows that she is not the typical woman with no opinions or real role in life.
Binary opposition may limit the understanding of this gender issue because most people believe in the stereotypes that they hear. Some men really do feel as if a woman belongs in the kitchen and that is her purpose in life. When a film shows those stereotypes in a believable situation, people tend to believe it. In this film, the classic role of women goes far beyond anyone’s perception and it put men in a bad light. The women in this film were robots that were controlled by remotes that their husbands had. They were to do everything around the house and please their husbands. They were the “perfect” wives and the men wouldn’t have it any other way. This shows the idea of masculinity not only because men are egotistic but they can be shallow and controlling. In many cases, in traditional films men were trying to be the hero, but in really they were just being dominant. Women have always sat in the background and they seem to evolve slowly as time goes by. Films that show the binary opposition between males and females have a strong point to make and usually go back to the convention roles of each gender.

Colleen said...

In the movie, "Little Rascals," the binary opposition of men vs. women is portayed in a much less serious way -- boys vs. girls. The leader of the "He Man Women Haters Club," Spanky, will do anything in his eight year old power to keep his best friend Alfalfa away from his new girlfriend, Darla.

Although the binary opposition present in this film makes for many comedic and cute situations, in the long run it could have an adverse effect. Even though it is normal for young boy and girls to argue and not get along, eventually they must grow out of it. If the characters in this film were to grow up still having the same feelings toward the other sex, these boys and girls would never be able to have any healthy relationships because their attitudes would be too negative for anything good to come from them.

Brian Bauerband said...

‘Apocalypse Now’ is a good example of using binary opposition to contrast civilization vs. barbarism. The basic plot takes place during the Vietnam War and is about a captain in the US army called Willard who is tasked by his superiors to assistant a former colonel named Kurtz who has taken control of indigenous local tribes to wage war against the Viet Cong in an “unsound” manner. The generals that command Willard to assassinate Kurtz represent the forces of civilization, they are fighting a war, but in demands that certain rules are followed and that there is restraint in their actions. Kurtz represents barbarism; he is winning his war, but doing so by terror and absolute destruction, no restraint. As Willard travels up the river to do his mission, he leaves behind the civilization of the generals and enters the barbarism of Kurtz. The conflict between the two opposite forces plays out in Willard’s experiences as he travels to meet Kurtz. He sees how in war, an act of barbarism in itself, is failing in the hands of the ‘civilized’ generals through civilizations lack of commitment to the brutal work of killing ones enemies. With Kurtz, however, Willard sees how barbarism is winning the war for Kurtz but at the const of decency and morality, civilized characteristics.
The binary opposition of civilization vs. barbarism when applied to the war setting of the film points out how neither side truly handles the situation well. The civilized side is paralyzed by their inability to commit to do the horrible things required to win and the barbaric side only seeks total destruction with no control. I think the film suggests how man needs to be both a little civilized and a little barbaric to be complete.

Craig said...

In the movie American History X the issue of racism is addressed by using binary opposition. The story follows a neo-nazi white supremacist named Derek Vinyard, played by Edward Nortan, who is the leader of a gang called the D.O.C.(deciples of christ). After killing two black enemy gang members Derek is sent to jail for three years. jail changes his views and leaves him a peaceful man. After his three years he returns to find his little brother knee deep in the gang he once led.

The binary opposition in this film is soo thick. basically the film is a racial war between the whites and the blacks. The whites hold the sterotypical view that they are a better race and above all other races. This mentality leads to their overall downfall at the end of the movie. The binary opposition of whites vs blacks has a blinding effect to the overall madness of the film. Through racism both sides are blinded from their actions and stray from rational thought.

Craig said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Night of the Living Dead, although by no means a western, provides many different issues pertaining to binary opposites. The plot is simplistic in we have a small group of people boarding themselves up inside a farmhouse, trying to save themselves from an ever-growing crowd of zombies. We have the community of zombies brought together in one cause, against the individuals inside the house who spend a majority of the time bickering. We can see in this a spin on community vs. individual, and also a tending toward a nature vs. man.
The situation of the individuals (community vs. individuals) gives rise to many different issues. We have a black protagonist, which was unusual for this time. There is also a dissolved state of social class in regards to race, in that blacks and whites in the movie seem not concerned about their differences in race, only about staying alive. The audience is the one who perceive these differences. There is the lead female character that falls to pieces early on in the movie and does little to help, instead taking up a roll of weakness and 'female emotional instability'. We also have the issue of social class being presented from the side of the gathering zombies.
An interesting point on the issue of sexuality for this movie is that when it was remade in the 90's the role of the female is altered. She no longer is weak, but becomes a fighter and survivor of the situation.
The use of binary opposition in this movie, community vs. individual, or in this case the undead vs. the living can limit adequate understanding of the issues addressed simply because in order to perceive the issues the viewer must like the individuals inside the house overcome the horror. For example in an issue of class we can see the mistreatment of the zombies at the end of the movie in their being lynched. We can perceive this as both a race issue and a class issue only if we can begin to see them with a certain degree of humanity. If viewers view the movie only as a terror, and leave feeling satisfied that the zombies have been destroyed then the issue will be lost. We will also lose this meaning if the zombies are still viewed as individuals of a former life, instead of members of a new community, and this in fact becomes one of the central themes.
~Matthew Neal

Ty said...

The graphic novel Maus: A Survivor’s Tale, written and illustrated by Art Spiegelman recounts the story of the author’s father’s struggle to survive Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. In its depiction, it uses binary opposition to discuss many themes we cover in this course: racial issues, brought about through the use of anthropomorphic animals, most notable the use of cats vs. mice, class issues, seen in the constant arguments between the author and his father(young vs old), as well as the classic opposition of absolute good vs. absolute evil.
I think that by using binary opposition, Art is able to more easily narrate his father’s story. By limiting the elements of the graphic novel to total opposites, Art makes it easier for the reader to relate to his father’s tragic past. This is especially made manifest through Art's use of cat and mouse to depict Germans and Jews. This image reverts our thought to classical toons in our culture like Tom and Jerry, and simplifies the complexity of what was the Holocaust. It also makes it easier for the story to digest. Images of dead mice are much easier to view than images of dead people.
In this context, I think that binary opposition acutally helps, rather than limit the novel's understanding.

insamiety said...

Cannibal Holocaust (IMDb)

In 1980 Italian director Ruggero Deodato released a film that would eventually come to be known as the most notorious film ever made. The film starts off following a well known anthropologist who travels deep into the Amazon Rainforest in order to search for a group of four students who went in search of the fabled Amazonian cannibals in order to film a documentary about them and eventually went missing. After a harrowing journey the anthropologist eventually comes a across a tribe of cannibals and finds out that the students were killed by that cerain tribe but that their undeveloped flm was still intact. He manages to get a hold of the film and makes his way back to New York to bring the film back to the film studio that funded the student's jouney. Upon ariving in New York he is finally able to see the film. After seeing the grotesque and inhuman nature of the footage he tries to convince the studio executives to scrap the project. Initially they refuse but eh convinces them to view raw the footage themselves and after viewing the footage they immidiately decide to burn all copies of the film. The binary opposition of this film is that of modern civilization vs. backwards cultures. This binary however strays from Deodato's original vision of the film being a critique on modern civilization.

Unknown said...

The movie Lone Star used binary opposition when it used the indiginous Mexican people versus the settling or invading whites and blacks of the United States. This is a relationship that isn't often shown in movies but is a big issue in border states such as Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. Some of the Mexican families can be traced back for hundreds of years but with the arrival of Americans during the 1800s and attempting to settle the surrounding areas. Eventually wars were fought and the land became part of the United States. This left a lot of these small towns in disbalance as the minority was ruling the majority. For example in the movie it was stated that 95% of the people in the community were Mexican. Though it was only partially developed in the movie, there was a clear understanding that this set up sometimes led to clashes between the groups.
You could also take it to another binary opposite and include the whites against the blacks or the mexicans against the blacks. There was only one black bar and the small area inhabited by blacks was referred to as Darktown. There was some tension there as the blacks were somewhat detached from the rest of the community. All of this diversity creating a boiling pot waiting to explode. The movie didn't go in this direction but it was definitely always a possibility.

jack said...

The film "Boondock Saints" portrey a few different binary opposites. In this movie, two Irish brothers decide that it is up to them to take out crime bosses throughout Boston. So, the brothers start killing all of the mobsters and criminals. The binary opposition here would be good vs. evil or justice vs. crime. The two brothers stand for good and are looked at by some as heros. They take justice into their own hands. Also, there is the issue of race in this movie. All of the different crime families are of different nationality and all hate eachother. In the movie you have Irish vs Russians, Italians vs Chinese etc. You could also say that this movie portreys the issue of class. The two brothers are very poor but they are able to defeat extremely wealthy people.

grebe said...



The film "Boondocks Saints" portrays a great example of binary opposition, that involves both class, as well as good versus evil. The setting is Boston and two Irish brothers have come to their own realization that they have been chose to rid the world of evil. The main element of binary opposition in "Boondocks Saints" would be the so called good murdering (playing God) versus the thugs and criminals of Boston's underworld. Is there such a thing as a difference between righteous murdering and evil murdering? Another element of binary opposition used involves race and would be the righteours Irish heroes against Russian thugs who have taken over Boston. This issue of taking the law into your own hands is a double edged sword. The Irish twin brothers might be somewhat justified in their killings of Russian thugs, but also there's the other side of it, which would be, is it there place to murder these men. Do two wrongs justify a right? This is an issue of corrupt versus justice, but as the movie portrays this is not a black and white issue, there is a grey area. The two brothers only kill Russian thugs, but most of their killings are very brutal and they show no mercy, wich clouds up the issue of justice and corrupt. They say a prayer before their killings, but it is not for the ones they are shooting, but for themselves; a prayer that they feels justifies their actions. This issue is a very complicated issue, and while it is hard to sit back and watch the justice system let these criminals slip through the cracks; it is also a tough decision to decide that you or someone else has the power to start mass executions (to take part in acts that put you on the criminal's levels).

Unknown said...

The movie "The Outsiders" uses class binary opposition with the Greasers vs. the Socs. This is the height of Class warfare in this story. It's the story of rival factions of teenagers, the rich social elites and the poor, parent-less greasers. Just like "Westside Story," one of the greasers falls for one of the socs and the gangs start fighting. In the fight, Johnny, a greaser knifes a soc which forces him and Ponyboy into hiding from the police. The irony in the situation is that had the murder happened the other way around, nothing would've been done to the socs because they were the rich. Yet even more ironic is the fact that while in hiding, Johnny and Ponyboy go through an intellectual revelation discussing poetry and the beauty of innocence and holding onto what is golden in life. The story ends with another big fight between the greasers and socs and Johnny dying in the hospital from injuries due to a previous event.

The binary opposition limits understanding of the issue addressed because the similarities of the rival gangs is completely ignored. The humanity of the socs is not even brought up and the unfairness of police towards the greasers is (seemingly) perfectly acceptable. The polarizing of the two groups prevents the viewer from grasping how truly similar they are, much like American politics.